Decarbonising Supply Chains: Where Companies Start and What They Miss

last updated
April 30, 2026

The decarbonisation plan is presented to the board by the Chief Sustainability Officer. The organization can achieve its Scope 1 and 2 targets through three methods, which include boiler replacement, renewable power purchase agreements, and fleet electrification. 

A board member raises a question about supplier emissions. The room becomes silent. The procurement team has not measured its upstream environmental impacts. The finance department does not track carbon emissions within its purchase order system. The sustainability team is the only group that manages Scope 3 reduction projects.

Organizations often underestimate the scale of supplier emissions beyond their direct operational control. According to Boston Consulting Group (September 2025), Scope 3 upstream emissions are, on average, 21 times higher than Scope 1 and 2 emissions combined (2). Companies focus on direct operations while their largest carbon exposure sits upstream in supplier activities.

Supply chain networks remain one of the largest untapped levers for corporate carbon footprint reduction. A professional equipped with a sustainability leadership course in India could help their organization build structured supplier partnerships, fundamentally change their climate risk exposure, and improve their competitive positioning.

What Scope 3 Decarbonisation Actually Requires?

Organizations need to decrease their greenhouse gas emissions, which result from their purchased goods and services, as well as upstream supply chain processes and all other indirect operations that exist in their value chain. This process results from three main approaches, which include supplier engagement and low-carbon procurement standards, together with joint emissions reduction initiatives.

The finance director approves capital expenditure for operational efficiency upgrades. The reduction of Scope 3 emissions needs procurement teams to change supplier contracts, while supply chain teams must create emissions data systems, and legal teams must handle shared responsibility frameworks.

The International Sustainability Standards Board ISSB S2 disclosure requirements mandate organizations to report purchased goods and services, which constitute the most extensive Scope 3 category used by manufacturing, retail, and materials industries. (6)

The Science Based Targets initiative requires companies to establish Scope 3 targets when their total emissions show that 67% of their emissions come from Scope 3 emissions (5). Most organizations find that more than 70% of their emissions originate from supply chain activities. The target becomes unavoidable (3).

Where Companies Actually Start and Immediately Stall?

Companies typically begin with a spend-based emissions calculation, multiplying procurement expenditure by industry-average emission factors. The CFO’s team already tracks spending data. Consultants run the emissions model. Leadership sees results within weeks as steel, chemicals, packaging, and component purchases exceed operational emissions totals.

The next step involves supplier data collection. Procurement teams send questionnaires to 300 suppliers requesting Scope 1 and 2 emissions data, electricity consumption, renewable energy percentages, and decarbonisation targets. Response rates range between 15 and 20 percent. Data quality varies significantly. Small suppliers lack formal measurement systems. Larger suppliers provide corporate-level emissions data that cannot be allocated to specific product lines.

The MIT Sloan Management Review 2025 State of Supply Chain Sustainability Report, surveying more than 1,200 supply chain professionals across 97 countries, found that approximately 70 percent of respondents cited insufficient supplier information as their primary barrier to Scope 3 monitoring (1). While more than 40 percent of companies measure Scope 1 and 2 emissions, far fewer can measure Scope 3 with similar rigor (1).

Organizations stall because they approach supplier emissions as a reporting challenge rather than a procurement transformation issue.

What Does This Look Like in Practice?

A European consumer goods manufacturer conducts a spend-based analysis for its packaging suppliers in preparation for CDP disclosure requirements. The procurement team must reduce packaging emissions by 30 percent before 2030 to meet the Science Based Targets initiative validation criteria (5).

The intervention includes:

Tool used: The supplier engagement platform establishes connections to both procurement systems and life cycle assessment databases, which include EcoVadis and the CDP Supply Chain Program (7).

Concerned Team involved: The team consists of procurement category managers and sustainability analysts, together with supplier quality teams and R&D specialists responsible for material specifications.

Output created: The supplier scorecards use carbon performance as 25 percent of the total score assessment. The new packaging requirements establish a base recycled material content and mandate suppliers to report their greenhouse gas emissions. The supplier development program conducts its assessment process every three months.

Timeline: The pilot program will begin after six months, when work begins with the top 10 suppliers selected based on their spending. The process will take 18 months to distribute requirements to all other strategic suppliers.

Suppliers are segmented into three categories. Tier 1 suppliers, representing 70 percent of packaging spend, must disclose emissions and demonstrate progress toward science-based targets by 2026 in exchange for preferred contract terms. Tier 2 suppliers are encouraged to disclose emissions and receive access to shared decarbonisation resources. Tier 3 suppliers initially rely on industry-average data with defined improvement expectations.

The procurement team establishes carbon performance criteria within supplier scorecards before demanding detailed supplier data. Suppliers recognize that emissions performance affects contract renewal, pricing discussions, and long-term partnership prospects. Response rates among strategic suppliers increase to 65 percent.

The Supplier Engagement Multiplier

Boston Consulting Group research (September 2025) shows that structured supplier engagement is the most effective lever for achieving Scope 3 targets. Companies with formal supplier engagement programs are nine times more likely to meet decarbonisation objectives than those without structured engagement processes (2).

This approach extends beyond questionnaires. It reframes suppliers as strategic decarbonisation partners.

For example, an automotive OEM establishes a supplier climate academy providing:

  • Access to carbon accounting software at negotiated rates
  • Training in life cycle assessment methodologies aligned with ISO 14044
  • Science-based target setting templates using SBTi frameworks (5)
  • Co-investment in renewable energy projects through aggregated power purchase agreements
  • Preferential payment terms for suppliers that establish verified reduction targets

As Tier 1 suppliers improve, they engage Tier 2 suppliers, creating upstream emissions reductions at the source. The OEM achieves its Scope 3.1 purchased goods and services target through cascading supplier improvements. Competitive differentiation emerges as peer OEMs adopt similar standards.

Organizations that treat low-carbon procurement as a compliance exercise forfeit strategic advantage. Leading procurement functions invest in supplier capability development, building resilience against tightening decarbonisation standards across industries.

Conclusion

The largest opportunity for corporate carbon reduction lies in supplier emissions, yet many organizations fail to operationalize this reality. Boston Consulting Group demonstrates that companies are nine times more likely to meet Scope 3 targets when they adopt structured supplier engagement rather than passive reporting approaches (2).

The gap lies between understanding Scope 3 and operationalizing it. Procurement requires low-carbon product specifications. Finance requires supplier development investment cases. Many sustainability programs emphasize emissions measurement without addressing cross-functional transformation.

The sustainability leadership course in India focused on implementation equips professionals to convert supplier emissions from a compliance risk into a competitive advantage. These executive sustainable development courses support procurement leaders establishing supplier requirements aligned with Scope 3 targets, supply chain directors expanding decarbonisation partnerships, and sustainability managers securing capital approval.

Graphic showing four diverse male portraits connected by orbiting colored dots around a central figure.
Take the Next Step with evACAD
Get Started!

FAQ

Why is supplier emissions data difficult to collect for Scope 3 reporting?

Companies request emissions data from suppliers, but they fail to provide the necessary tools and training, and financial incentives to their suppliers. The best methods for organizations to achieve their goals should combine their contractual requirements with their supplier development initiatives instead of treating carbon performance as an obligation to deliver reports.

How should companies prioritize suppliers for decarbonisation?

Organizations should prioritize suppliers responsible for the highest emissions within material categories. Procurement teams use materiality assessments to identify segments of suppliers who have the highest environmental impact.

What metrics demonstrate that supplier engagement is effective?

The key indicators measure three main elements, which include the percentage of strategic suppliers who set science-based targets, the annual carbon intensity reductions, and the company's participation in disclosure programs such as CDP and the verified avoided emissions that the company achieved when compared to business-as-usual baselines.

How do carbon border taxes affect supply chain strategy?

Carbon border mechanisms impose extra charges on imported products, which are determined by the products' embedded greenhouse gas emissions. Procurement professionals must understand carbon accounting to mitigate exposure to high-emission supplier tariffs.

Should companies invest in supplier decarbonisation or switch suppliers?

The strategic supplier investments lead to long-term business stability while creating better pricing agreements and enabling joint innovation development, which will result from increasing decarbonization demands.

Talk to Advisor over call
Blue upward arrow inside a white circle with a blue border.