In early 2024, India took a landmark step toward aligning its financial system with its climate and sustainability ambitions by releasing the draft framework for a national green taxonomy. Modeled in part after the European Union’s influential taxonomy but contextualized for India’s developmental realities, this effort signals a new era in climate-aligned finance, one where India is not merely a policy taker but a potential standard-setter for the Global South.
At its core, a green taxonomy is a classification system, a way to define what qualifies as “sustainable” economic activity. In today’s financial ecosystem, increasingly crowded with ESG claims, sustainability-linked bonds, and green finance instruments, a taxonomy serves as a regulatory compass. It helps investors, lenders, and regulators identify which activities genuinely advance Net Zero goals and which may be instances of greenwashing.
India’s entry into the taxonomy space could not be more timely. As the country pursues a $10 trillion economy by 2035, while committing to a Net Zero pathway by 2070, mobilizing green capital, particularly from private and institutional investors, has become non-negotiable. Yet, capital without clarity risks misallocation, reputational risks, and inconsistent climate impact.
The draft taxonomy, spearheaded by the Ministry of Finance with support from multiple stakeholders, aims to close this gap by offering a credible framework for sustainable investment and ESG accountability.
The EU Taxonomy, launched in 2020, remains the global benchmark for defining climate-sustainable activities. Built around six environmental objectives and the robust “do no significant harm” principle, it has already nudged European capital markets toward more credible green investments. However, it has also faced criticism for being overly complex, Eurocentric, and difficult to apply in emerging economies.
India’s taxonomy, in contrast, seeks contextual relevance. It prioritizes sectors such as renewable energy, e-mobility, sustainable agriculture, water and sanitation, and the circular economy. These are areas that are both climate-critical and central to India’s development goals. This signals a broader ambition: ensuring the taxonomy is not just about carbon reductions, but about inclusive green growth.
Importantly, India’s framework aligns with the Common Ground Taxonomy (CGT), co-developed by the EU and China. This alignment helps with global interoperability, making Indian markets more attractive to foreign investors while preserving India’s unique developmental lens.
Where India’s approach stands out most is its emphasis on a just transition. Recognizing that millions of jobs and enterprises are tied to carbon-intensive sectors, the taxonomy expands the scope beyond “pure green” activities to include the greening of brown sectors.
This opens pathways for transition finance, funding that supports hard-to-abate sectors like steel, cement, and MSMEs in adopting cleaner technologies without creating large-scale economic dislocation.
The framework also embeds principles of climate justice, enabling investments in adaptation and resilience, such as climate-smart irrigation, nature-based solutions, and early warning systems to qualify as green, even if their carbon mitigation potential is modest. This approach aligns with India’s global advocacy for equity in climate finance and resilience-building for vulnerable communities.
The taxonomy’s ripple effects extend well beyond policymaking:
By offering comparability and regulatory certainty, India’s green taxonomy has the potential to attract global sustainable finance flows, while strengthening domestic accountability.
The success of India’s taxonomy will rest not on the framework alone but on implementation and adoption. Financial institutions will need capacity building, data infrastructure, and climate literacy. SMEs and local governments will require guidance to understand taxonomy-aligned opportunities.
India must also develop green registries, enable taxonomy-linked credit scoring, and create fiscal or regulatory incentives for compliant activities. Early alignment with SEBI’s BRSR Core and the RBI’s climate stress-testing roadmap is encouraging, but further integration is essential.
Most importantly, the taxonomy must be positioned as a narrative for sustainable development, not just a compliance exercise. To resonate with investors, corporates, and citizens alike, it should be seen as a roadmap to India’s Net Zero journey and sustainable growth model.
India’s green taxonomy is more than a regulatory tool. It is a strategic instrument for Net Zero transition, climate-resilient development, and green finance leadership. If executed well, it could set a precedent for other emerging economies navigating the balance between growth and sustainability.
This also highlights the critical need for leaders who can navigate sustainability, ESG reporting, and climate finance frameworks. Programs such as the IIM Kashipur- PG Executive Program in Net Zero Strategy & Sustainability Leadership, in collaboration with evACAD, are designed to equip professionals with the knowledge and leadership skills to drive these transformations. Covering areas such as carbon markets, clean energy transitions, ESG integration, and green finance, this program prepares decision-makers to play a pivotal role in shaping India’s sustainable economy.
As global climate finance accelerates, the world will look not only to Brussels and Beijing but also to New Delhi for models of inclusive, credible, and scalable green finance. A well-designed and well-implemented green taxonomy could become India’s most powerful contribution to sustainable investment in the Global South.
For professionals, policymakers, and investors alike, this is more than regulation. It is an opportunity to shape the future of Net Zero strategy, ESG accountability, and sustainability leadership in India and beyond.
%20(1).png)
.webp)
